Author:
Manchiraju Srikant,Sadachar Amrut
Abstract
Purpose
– The role of personal values in consumer behavior is well documented; however, in the context of fashion consumption, the role of personal values’ influence on consumers’ ethical behavior has not been studied. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to seek to explore whether consumers’ personal values predict consumers’ behavioral intentions to engage in ethical fashion consumption.
Design/methodology/approach
– The present study employed the Fritzsche model, which states that an individual's personal values are related to his/her intentions to engage in ethical behavior. The present study examined the causal relationship between the personal values and behavioral intentions to engage in ethical fashion consumption. Data collected from the US national sample were subjected to structural equation modeling.
Findings
– The proposed model explained 42 percent of variance in consumer's behavioral intentions toward ethical fashion consumption. Furthermore, a significant negative relationship between self-enhancement personal values and behavioral intention toward ethical fashion consumption was found. Several theoretical and practical implications related to the present study were discussed.
Originality/value
– To the authors’ knowledge, the study is first of its kind in several aspects: first, ethical fashion consumption has been conceptualized in the broadest definition possible, as oppose to focussing on a particular facet of fashion consumption (e.g. organic products or counterfeit fashion); second, linking consumer personal values as a predictor of his/her ethical fashion consumption behavioral intentions; and third, employing the Fritzsche model in fashion behavior context.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference84 articles.
1. Ahuvia, A.C.
and
Wong, N.
(1995), “Materialism: origins and implications for personal well-being”, European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 2, pp. 172-178.
2. Ajzen, I.
(1985), “From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior”, in
Kuhl, J.
and
Beckmann, J.
(Eds), Cognition to Behavior, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 11-39.
3. Alexander, C.S.
and
Becker, H.J.
(1978), “The use of vignettes in survey research”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 93-104.
4. Armitage, C.J.
and
Conner, M.
(2001), “Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review”, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 471-499.
5. Atzmüller, C.
and
Steiner, P.M.
(2010), “Experimental vignette studies in survey research”, Methodology, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 128-138.
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献