Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop and validate scales measuring two consumer moral preferences: Homo moralis and Homo economicus.Design/methodology/approachThis research includes four sequential studies. Before the first study, items were established through a comprehensive literature review and pre-test. Four studies were then conducted to verify the validity and reliability of the scales following the scale validation methodology suggested by Churchill (1979) and Anand and Kaur (2018). Study 1 employed exploratory factor analysis to extract the underlying factor structure of the scale. This led to a two-factor structure with sufficient evidence of internal reliability. Study 2 and Study 3 were conducted to confirm the reliability and the validity of the scale using confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. The final study established the predictive validity of the scale using a structural equation model.FindingsFinally, seven items were developed measuring consumers' moral preferences for Homo moralis and Homo economicus.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has some limitations that should be addressed in future research. First, the scale was only tested in a Korean context. Second, this study was not conducted in the context of a specific industry.Originality/valueThis study extends the range of research to an empirical field by practically verifying how these two preferences are independent, can be generalized and can influence human behavior. This study empirically demonstrates that the preferences affect human behavior such as purchase intention. This study extends the current knowledge on Homo moralis and Homo economicus by providing a scale for empirical validation of the concepts.
Reference56 articles.
1. Equity theory revisited: comments and annotated bibliography;Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1976
2. The theory of planned behavior;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991
3. Homo moralis? preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching;Econometrica,2013
4. Fashion self-congruity: scale development and validation;Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,2018
5. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach;Psychological Bulletin,1988
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献