Author:
Holbrook Allyson,Spray Erika,Burke Rachel,Shaw Kylie M.,Carruthers Jayne
Abstract
Purpose
Highly developed and agile learners who can clearly convey and call on their skills are sought in all walks of life. Diverse demand for these capacities has called attention to how the skills and knowledge gained during doctoral study can be conveyed, translated and leveraged in non-academic settings; however, the complex learning reality underneath doctoral development is challenging to convey.
Design/methodology/approach
The data set for this particular analysis was obtained from 245 in-depth telephone interviews with PhD candidates collected prior to COVID-19. Candidates were asked about learning processes, challenges and changes, and both the questions and thematic analysis were guided by theories of doctoral development and transformational learning.
Findings
For many participants, learning and development were not familiar topics, while a small proportion deflected questions about learning altogether. One fifth of participants presented rich and lucid accounts of learning in which cognisance of complexity, metacognitive processes and transformational experiences were embedded and multiple avenues of development were in evidence. They were well-placed to convey the complexion of doctoral development. Candidates more deeply engaged in learning also commented more about changes they noticed in themselves. The most identified avenue of development was in understanding and approach to knowledge.
Originality/value
Candidate communication about learning and development is an under-explored dimension of doctoral experience and skill that is relevant to advancing knowledge about doctoral development and illuminating graduate potential both within and outside academe. This must constitute a key element of the re-vitalisation of the doctorate post-pandemic. The salience of framing transferable skills within a learning development perspective is discussed.
Reference30 articles.
1. The value of the research doctorate: a conceptual examination;The International Journal of Management Education,2019
2. Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) (2013), “The AQF second edition January 2013”, available at: www.aqf.edu.au/framework/australian-qualifications-framework (accessed 4 March 2023).
3. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006
4. Doctoral candidates as learners: a study of individual differences in responses to learning and its management;Studies in Higher Education,2017
5. Individual differences that affect the quality of learning in doctoral candidates,2012