Investigating the work practices of network security professionals

Author:

Adnan Muhammad,Just Mike,Baillie Lynne,Kayacik Hilmi Gunes

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the work practices of network security professionals and to propose a new and robust work practices model of these professionals. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed work practices model is composed by combining the findings of ten notable empirical studies performed so far this century. The proposed model was then validated by an online survey of 125 network security professionals with a wide demographic spread. Findings – The empirical data collected from the survey of network security professionals strongly validate the proposed work practices model. The results also highlight interesting trends for different groups of network security professionals, with respect to performing different security-related activities. Research limitations/implications – Further studies could investigate more closely the links and dependencies between the different activities of the proposed work practices model and tools used by network security professionals to perform these activities. Practical implications – A robust work practices model of network security professionals could hugely assist tool developers in designing usable tools for network security management. Originality/value – This paper proposes a new work practices model of network security professionals, which is built by consolidating existing empirical evidence and validated by conducting a survey of network security professionals. The findings enhance the understanding of tool developers about the day-to-day activities of network security professionals, consequently assisting developers in designing better tools for network security management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems,Software,Management Information Systems

Reference24 articles.

1. Armstrong, R.A. (2014), “When to use the Bonferroni correction”, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics , Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 502-508.

2. Biros, D.P. and Eppich, T. (2001), “Human element key to intrusion detection”, available at: www.afcea.org/content/?q=node/516 (accessed 7 January 2014).

3. Botta, D. , Werlinger, R. , Gagne, A. , Beznosov, B. , Iverson, L. , Fels, S. and Fisher, B. (2007), “Towards understanding IT security professionals and their tools”, Proceedings of Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), ACM, pp. 100-111.

4. Cichonski, P. , Millar, T. , Grance, T. and Scarfone, K. (2012), “Computer security incident handling guide”, available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-61rev2/SP800-61rev2.pdf (accessed 10 February 2014).

5. D’Amico, A. and Whitley, K. (2008), “Real work of computer network defense analysts”, Proceedings of VizSEC 2007 , Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 19-37.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessing the Effectiveness of the Cisco Networking Academy Program in Developing Countries;Information Security Education for a Global Digital Society;2017

2. Investigating Time Series Visualisations to Improve the User Experience;Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2016-05-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3