Author:
Taylor Terrance J.,Winfree L. Thomas
Abstract
PurposeAims to responds to Goddard and Jaeger (Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management (PIJPSM), Vol. 28 No. 4) who offered a thorough critique of an article previously published in PIJPSM.Design/methodology/approachWelcoming the insights Goddard and Jaeger provide, attempts to address their expressed concerns and elaborate on the rationale behind the various definitions and methods. Additionally, seeks to expand the general discourse about policing in a comparative context.FindingsGoddard and Jaeger raise concerns about several conceptual and methodological approaches used in the study. While the present authors do not agree with all of Goddard and Jaeger's critique, they do agree on one of the most important points: employing multiple methodologies whenever possible is essential to the advancement of any science.Originality/valueProvides a response to a thorough critique of an article previously published in PIJPSM.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference21 articles.
1. Bass, J. (1995), “Rural policing: patterns and problems of ‘micro’ departments”, The Justice Professional, Vol. 9, p. 9.
2. Brough, P. and Frame, R. (2004), “Predicting police job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the role of social support and police organizational variables”, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 8‐15.
3. Butler, E.K., Winfree, L.T. Jr and Newbold, G. (2003), “Policing and gender: male and female perspectives among members of the New Zealand police”, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 298‐329.
4. Decker, S. (1979), “The rural sheriff: an issue in social control”, Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 4, pp. 97‐111.
5. Esseltyn, T.C. (1953), “The social role of the county sheriff”, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, Vol. 44, pp. 177‐84.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献