Departmental and citizen complaints as predictors of police coercion

Author:

McCluskey John D.,Terrill William

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to examine a variety of measures of complaints and their relationship to police officers' use of coercion in encounters with suspects.Design/methodology/approachData from the Project on Policing Neighborhoods, involving the systematic social observation of police, were combined with complaint data from the St Petersburg Police Department to examine the influence of complaints on use of coercion in everyday encounters. Hierarchical models, which included theoretically relevant control variables, were used to test multiple measures of departmental and citizen complaints as predictors of officers' use of coercion.FindingsThe analyses indicate that, net of other important predictors, officer complaint rate for force and verbal discourtesy is associated with higher levels of coercion in encounters with suspects. The analyses also indicate that officers' verbal discourtesy complaint rate is associated with higher levels of coercion, but complaint rates for physical force are not related to higher levels of coercion.Research limitations/implicationsThe current results do not necessarily generalize to all police departments, since the department, at that time, was a leader in community policing.Practical implicationsThe influence of complaints for force and discourtesy on coercion suggests that police departments could benefit from greater attention toward officers who generate complaints for discourtesy from the public.Originality/valueThis paper examines the utility of official complaint data as a determinant of officers' coercive behavior in encounters with suspects. The research would be of interest to police executives concerned with creating “early warning systems” as well as police scholars concerned with the determinants of officer coercion.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. Adams, K. (1996), “Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force”, in Geller, W.A. and Toch, H. (Eds), Police Violence, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 52‐93.

2. Alpert, G.P. and Dunham, R.G. (1997), The Force Factor: Measuring Police Use of Force Relative to Suspect Resistance, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC.

3. Bittner, E. (1970), The Functions of Police in Modern Society, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

4. Black, D.J. (1976), The Behavior of Law, Academic Press, New York, NY.

5. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. and Visher, C.A. (Eds) (1986), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3