Factors influencing job satisfaction among state conservation officers

Author:

Eliason Stephen L.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research was to identify and describe factors associated with job satisfaction among conservation officers.Design/methodology/approachThe study took a qualitative approach to data collection that included a survey and 24 in‐depth interviews with Kentucky conservation officers. Data were examined with the intention of identifying common themes.FindingsFour categories associated with job satisfaction were identified: enjoyment of the outdoors, independence, job diversity/variety, and meeting people. The majority of conservation officers found their work very satisfying.Research limitations/implicationsThe results are not generalizable, given the qualitative nature of the research. To allow the generalizability of findings, future research should include quantitative measures that could specify how additional factors are related to job satisfaction among conservation officers, such as age, years of service, rank, and education. Future studies should also examine job satisfaction among female conservation officers.Practical implicationsA useful source of information for individuals who are considering a career in conservation law enforcement.Originality/valueThis paper extends understanding of job satisfaction among police, and should be of particular interest to state wildlife agencies as well as those interested in rural and specialized policing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. Altherr, T.L. (1978), “The American hunter‐naturalist and the development of the code of sportsmanship”, Journal of Sport History, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7‐22.

2. Bachman, R. (1992), “Crime in nonmetropolitan America: a national accounting of trends, incidence rates, and idiosyncratic vulnerabilities”, Rural Sociology, Vol. 57, pp. 546‐60.

3. Baird, D. (1983), “An Idaho tragedy – what can we learn”, Proceedings of the Western Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies, Vol. 63, pp. 65‐8.

4. Bissell, S.J., Duda, M.D. and Young, K.C. (1998), “Recent studies on hunting and fishing participation in the United States”, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 75‐80.

5. Bryant, C.D., Shoemaker, D.W., Skipper, J.K. and Snizek, W.E. (Eds) (1985), The Rural Workforce: Non‐Agricultural Occupations in America, Bergin and Garvey, South Hadley, MA.

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3