Race and police reliance on suspicious non‐verbal cues

Author:

Johnson Richard R.

Abstract

PurposeThis study seeks to evaluate the accuracy of non‐verbal behaviors in differentiating between criminals and innocent citizens in real‐life police‐citizen encounters, and evaluate the impact of race as a confounding influence on the display of these non‐verbal behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThis study involved the frame‐by‐frame analysis of 240 videotaped interactions between citizens and police officers to determine the frequency with which citizens of different races and differing roles (offender versus non‐offender) display specific non‐verbal behaviors officers are trained to believe are indicators of suspicion.FindingsThe findings suggest that the non‐verbal cues of frequent speech disruptions, frequent or inappropriate smiles, the avoidance of eye contact, and increased hand gestures are poor indicators of criminal involvement and are strongly influenced by the race/ethnicity of the individual.Research limitations/implicationsThe videotaped police‐citizen interactions on which this study was based were from a “reality television” show, thus preventing a random sample.Practical implicationsThis study would be useful to police officers who rely on the use of non‐verbal cues, training personnel who instruct in the areas of non‐verbal communication, and researchers who examine the potential causes of racial bias in the actions of police officers.Originality/valueWhile earlier studies have investigated this issue with laboratory experiments under artificial conditions, this study provides a test of the influence of race on non‐verbal behavior during real life official police‐citizen interactions in the field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G., Vrij, A. and Bull, R. (1996), “Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behavior”, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 461‐71.

2. Blair, J. and Kooi, B. (2004), “The gap between training and research in the detection of deception”, International Journal of Police Science and Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 77‐83.

3. Brown, M.F. (2001), Criminal Investigation: Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Butterworth‐Heinemann, Boston, MA.

4. Carroll v. United States (1925), “267 US 132”.

5. Connors, E.F. and Nugent, H. (1990), Street‐Level Narcotics Enforcement, US Bureau of Justice Assistance, Washington, DC.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3