Police organizational structure and child sexual abuse case attrition

Author:

Maguire Edward R.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the effects of formal police organizational structure on child sexual abuse case attrition.Design/methodology/approachData from two surveys were merged for this analysis: a 1988 survey of child abuse enforcement in US police departments, and the 1987 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) database produced by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Based on the structure‐performance link that is rooted in structural contingency theory, this study examines the effects of both global and specific structural features on two case disposition ratios. Because structure is more easily malleable than other factors that may affect performance, such as environment and context, it is important to know whether certain structural arrangements produce more desirable outcomes than others.FindingsThe results indicate that the global structural variables included in this analysis play a small role in child sexual abuse case attrition. None of the variables included in the model influence the rate at which cases are designated as “founded”. The size and height of police agencies and the rate at which they designate cases as founded both influence their arrest rates for child sexual abuse cases.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size made it difficult to estimate the models. Future research should test the findings reported here using larger samples.Originality/valueTo the author's knowledge this is the first study to compare the effects of global and specific structures on police outputs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference95 articles.

1. Avery, M. (1983), “The child abuse witness: potential for secondary victimization”, Criminal Justice Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 1‐48.

2. Bayley, D.H. (1992), “Comparative organization of the police in English‐speaking countries”, in Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (Eds), Modern Policing, Vol. 15, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 509‐46.

3. Belton, F.G. and Belton, S.R. (1987), Working with Violent Families: A Guide for Clinical and Legal Practitioners, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

4. Bollen, K.A. (1989a), “‘Cause’ and ‘effect’ indicators”, in Babbie, E. (Ed.) (Ed.), The Practice of Social Research, 5th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, p. 365.

5. Bollen, K.A. (1989b), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3