Author:
Valasik Matthew,Phillips Matthew
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to use nearly a century’s worth of gang research to inform us about modern terrorist groups, specifically the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Design/methodology/approach
A case study approach is employed, comparing and contrasting the competing theoretical frameworks of gangs and terrorist organisations to understand group structure, demographics, patterns of behaviour (e.g. territoriality, strategic, and instrumental violence), goals, and membership patterns of ISIS.
Findings
The qualitative differences of ISIS make them more comparable to street gangs than other terrorist groups.
Practical implications
ISIS, while being qualitatively different from other terrorist groups, actually has many similarities with street gangs allowing for the adaptation of effective gang prevention, intervention, and suppression strategies. This paper highlights how the expansive literature on street gangs is able to inform practical interventions to directly target ISIS and deradicalise potential recruits. By introducing a gang-terror nexus on the crime-terror continuum, this paper provides a useful perspective on the decentralised but dynamic nature of modern era insurgencies. This paper urges similar case studies of terrorist organisations to determine the extent to which they conform to street gang characteristics.
Originality/value
Terrorist groups are often compared to street gangs, yet it has not been until the last few years that gang researchers (Curry, 2011; Decker and Pyrooz, 2011, 2015a, b) have begun to compare and contrast these two deviant group archetypes. The goal of this paper is to use nearly a hundred years of gang research to better equip scholars and practitioners with a broader understanding of terrorism and insurgency in the era of globalisation by presenting a case study of ISIS using a street gang perspective.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference84 articles.
1. Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. (1997), “A new epoch – and spectrum – of conflict”, in Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. (Eds), In Athena’s Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age, Rand, Santa Monica, CA., pp. 1-22.
2. Antigang legislation and its potential impact: the promises and the pitfalls;Criminal Justice Policy Review,2003
3. Boghani, P. (2016), “‘Deradicalization’ is coming to America: does it work?”, PBS Frontline, 18 March, p. 1, available at: www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/deradicalization-is-coming-to-america-does-it-work
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献