Understanding modern terror and insurgency through the lens of street gangs: ISIS as a case study

Author:

Valasik Matthew,Phillips Matthew

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use nearly a century’s worth of gang research to inform us about modern terrorist groups, specifically the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Design/methodology/approach A case study approach is employed, comparing and contrasting the competing theoretical frameworks of gangs and terrorist organisations to understand group structure, demographics, patterns of behaviour (e.g. territoriality, strategic, and instrumental violence), goals, and membership patterns of ISIS. Findings The qualitative differences of ISIS make them more comparable to street gangs than other terrorist groups. Practical implications ISIS, while being qualitatively different from other terrorist groups, actually has many similarities with street gangs allowing for the adaptation of effective gang prevention, intervention, and suppression strategies. This paper highlights how the expansive literature on street gangs is able to inform practical interventions to directly target ISIS and deradicalise potential recruits. By introducing a gang-terror nexus on the crime-terror continuum, this paper provides a useful perspective on the decentralised but dynamic nature of modern era insurgencies. This paper urges similar case studies of terrorist organisations to determine the extent to which they conform to street gang characteristics. Originality/value Terrorist groups are often compared to street gangs, yet it has not been until the last few years that gang researchers (Curry, 2011; Decker and Pyrooz, 2011, 2015a, b) have begun to compare and contrast these two deviant group archetypes. The goal of this paper is to use nearly a hundred years of gang research to better equip scholars and practitioners with a broader understanding of terrorism and insurgency in the era of globalisation by presenting a case study of ISIS using a street gang perspective.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)

Reference84 articles.

1. Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. (1997), “A new epoch – and spectrum – of conflict”, in Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. (Eds), In Athena’s Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age, Rand, Santa Monica, CA., pp. 1-22.

2. Antigang legislation and its potential impact: the promises and the pitfalls;Criminal Justice Policy Review,2003

3. Boghani, P. (2016), “‘Deradicalization’ is coming to America: does it work?”, PBS Frontline, 18 March, p. 1, available at: www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/deradicalization-is-coming-to-america-does-it-work

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Confluences of War and Crime: Trajectories into Paramilitary Groups in Colombia;Studies in Conflict & Terrorism;2023-12-27

2. The street-jihadi spectrum: Marginality, radicalization and resistance to extremism;European Journal of Criminology;2023-06-26

3. Patterns That Maintain the Boko Haram Terrorism in Nigeria;On the Crisis of Boko Haram Terrorism;2023-06-02

4. Alt‐right gangs and far‐right extremists: From the margins to the mainstream;Sociology Compass;2023-04-05

5. Identity, Religion, and Radicalization;American Muslim Perspectives on Radicalization;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3