Siblings as socialization agents

Author:

Kerrane Ben,Bettany Shona M,Kerrane Katy

Abstract

Purpose – This paper explores how siblings act as agents of consumer socialisation within the dynamics of the family network. Design/methodology/approach – Key consumer socialisation literature is reviewed, highlighting the growing role that siblings play in the lives of contemporary children. The authors’ interpretive, exploratory study is introduced which captures the voices of children themselves through a series of in-depth interviews. Findings – A series of socialisation behaviours are documented, with children working in both positive and negative ways to develop the consumer skills of their siblings. A fourfold typology of sibling relationships is described, capturing the dynamic of sibling relationships and parental approaches to parenting vis-à-vis consumption. This typology is then used to present a typology of nascent child consumer identities that begin to emerge as a result of socialisation processes within the family setting. Research limitations/implications – The role siblings play in the process of consumer socialisation has potentially important implications in terms of the understanding of the socialisation process itself, and where/how children obtain product information. Scope exists to explore the role siblings play as agents of consumer socialisation across a wider variety of family types/sibling variables presented here (e.g. to explore how age/gender shapes the dynamics of sibling–sibling learning). Originality/value – Through adopting a networked approach to family life, the authors show how the wider family dynamic informs sibling–sibling relationships and resulting socialisation behaviours. The findings problematise the view that parents alone act as the main conduits of consumer learning within the family environment, highlighting how parent–child relationships, in turn, work to inform sibling–sibling socialisation behaviour and developing consumer identities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference63 articles.

1. Ackerman, D. , MacInnis, D. and Folkes, V. (2000), “Social comparisons of possessions: when it feels good and when it feels bad”, Advances in Consumer Research , Vol. 27, pp. 173-178.

2. Adler, A. (1927), Understanding Human Nature , The World Publishing Company, New York, NY.

3. Allen, K. , El-Beshti, R. and Guin, A. (2014), “An integrative Adlerian approach to creating a teen parenting program”, Journal of Individual Psychology , Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 6-20.

4. Baumrind, D. (1980), “New directions in socialization research”, Psychological Bulletin , Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 639-652.

5. Belk, R.W. and Pollay, R.W. (1985), “Materialism and magazine advertising during the twentieth century”, Advances in Consumer Research , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 394-398.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3