An analysis of Pakistan’s accountability law after June 2022 amendments: implications and effectiveness of anti-corruption campaign

Author:

Korejo Muhammad Saleem,Korejo Erum Naseer,Rajamanickam Ramalinggam,Md. Said Muhamad Helmi,Ullah Nazir

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide an analysis of National Accountability Ordinance 1999 (NAO) after June 2022 amendments. It raises a key question whether the new legislation is effective and improves anti-corruption operating system in Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach This paper performs an analysis of recent amendments incorporated in NAO from the observations of superior courts, United Nations Corruption Convention and Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidelines and also evaluates new legislation in terms of effectiveness in anti-corruption campaign. Findings This paper finds that ample amendments are inessential, and thus may largely jeopardize accountability process; changes appear to be intentionally crafted to benefit some selected group of people: the definition of asset is compressed; the onus of proof is shifted on the informer; and provisions of money trail, foreign evidence and protection of approver are abolished; such changes defy to the UN Corruption Convention and FATF guidelines. A legislation endorsed from all stakeholders is suggested; additionally, improved strategies proposed to strengthen accountability process while keeping in view the constitutional issues relevant in the course of anti-corruption investigations. Originality/value This paper is unique in the context of the anti-corruption strategies in Pakistan, highlighting the legal laxness of new government regarding corruption and money laundering.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference29 articles.

1. Amjad Mustafa Malik v NAB (2020), “2021 PLD 266 Islamabad (Islamabad high court 2020)”, Since Pakistan’s Court Cases Decisions are printed in book or manual form and the reference used is like: PLD-Pakistan’s Legal Decision, year 2020, SC [The Supreme Court] and No. 869, available at: https://mis.ihc.gov.pk/frmRdJgmnt?cseNo=W.P.%20769/2019%20(DB)%20%7C%202021%20PLD%20266%20Islamabad&cseTle=W.P.%20769/2019%20N.A.B.%20Bail%20(Amjad%20Mustafa%20Malik%20V/s%20DG,%20NAB%20etc)&hx0025;20(DB)&jgs=Honourable%20Chief%20Justice%20Mr.%20Justice%20Athar%20Minallah,%20Honourable%20Mr.%20Justice%20Miangul%20Hassan%20Aurangzeb&jgmnt=/attachments/judgements/W.P-769-2019___________________________637191724241191384.pdf

2. Asad, M. (2020), “Unchecked NAB powers against fundamental rights: IHC, report, dawn”, available at: www.dawn.com/news/print/1539166

3. Ayub, U. (2019), “Supreme court’s judgment in 2001 regarding national accountability bureau”, available at: https://courtingthelaw.com/2019/05/08/laws-judgments-2/judgment-analysis/supreme-courts-judgment-in-2001-regarding-national-accountability-bureau/ (accessed 25 June 2022).

4. Barone, R., Masciandaro, D. and Schneider, F. (2019), “Money laundering and corruption: birds of a feather flock together”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 7687, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich, available at: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201913/1/cesifo1_wp7687.pdf

5. Bhargava, V. (2005), “The cancer of corruption”, Paper presented at the World bank global issues seminar series.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3