1. Galbán-Rodriguez, E.
and
Arencibia-Jorge, R.
(2014), “Editorials and the cascading review process”,
European Science Editing
, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 34-35.
2. Grant, B.
(2010), “Editorials: to sign or not”,
The Scientist
, 26 August, available at: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/29211/title/Editorials--To-sign-or-not-/ (accessed 6 November 2015).
3. Singh, A.
and
Singh, S.
(2006), “What is a good editorial?”,
Mens Sana Monographs
, Vol. 491, pp. 14-17.
4. Smith, P.J.
,
Alexander, G.C.
and
Siegler, M.
(2006), “Should editorials in peer reviewed journals be signed?”,
Chest
, Vol. 129 No. 6, pp. 1395-1396.
5. van Leeuwen, T.
,
Costas, R.
,
Calero-Medina, C.
and
Visser, M.
(2013), “The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments”,
Scientometrics
, Vol. 95 No. 2, pp. 817-828.