Predictors of public support for police accreditation

Author:

Abner GordonORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to identify the predictors of public support for police accreditation under four different scenarios that vary based upon whether or not accreditation requires a property tax increase and whether or not local police support accreditation.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws upon survey data from 998 US adults. Four binary logistic models are employed to assess support for accreditation under four different scenarios.FindingsIndividual-level factors, including age, education, race, region, generalized trust, political ideology, and volunteer experience, are important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Community-level factors including perceptions of police performance and perceptions of property taxes are also important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Support for police accreditation is highest when police accreditation does not require a property tax increase and when local police support accreditation. Sixty-six percent of respondents support police accreditation under this scenario.Originality/valueThis article represents the first published study on the predictors of support for police accreditation. The findings from this study have important implications for implementing police reform given recent calls by activists to both reform the police and to defund them.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Experiments on the effects of positive and negative perceptions of a public sector profession;Public Performance and Management Review,2020

2. Assessing the correlates of CALEA accreditation: a state-of-the-art review;Policing: An International Journal,2022

3. Frederick police seek reaccreditation from national standards group;The Frederick News-Post,2019

4. When trust matters—a multilevel analysis of the effect of generalized trust on political participation in 25 European democracies;Journal of Civil Society,2016

5. Dynamics of public support for community policing (CP): findings from high-crime and low-crime residential neighborhoods;International Journal of Public Administration,2020

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Does national police accreditation undermine local control?;Policing: An International Journal;2024-05-14

2. How can we help law enforcement agencies learn? A look at CALEA police accreditation;Policing: An International Journal;2023-11-09

3. Does CALEA accreditation serve as a signal? A look at crime analysis;Journal of Experimental Criminology;2022-12-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3