ACAS installation on unmanned aerial vehicles: effectiveness and safety issues

Author:

Tomić Lidija,Čokorilo Olja,Vasov Ljubiša,Stojiljković Branimir

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to investigate the compatibility of manned-aircraft airborne collision avoidance systems (ACAS) for use on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Design/methodology/approach The paper uses the Fault Tree method for defining ACAS model adapted for the UAV operations, with the aim of showing the presence of certain factors that configure in such ACAS system, and whose failure can lead to an adverse event – mid-air collision. Findings Based on the effectiveness analysis of ACAS solution adapted for the UAV operations, for given inputs, it can be concluded that the probability of ACAS failure is on the order of 10–4, as well as that in the case of autonomous ACAS solution for the UAV, the probability is reduced to 10–5. The most influential factors for the failure of the UAV’s ACAS are as follows: technical implications on the UAV, human factor, sensor error, communication and C2 link issue. Practical implications The established model could be used both in the UAV’s ACAS design and application phases, with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of the adopted solution. The model outputs not only highlight the critical points of the system but also provide the basis for defining the Target Level of Safety (TLOS) for the UAV operations. Originality/value The developed model can be expected to speed up the design and adoption process of ACAS solutions for the UAVs. Also, the paper presents one of the first attempts to quantify TLOS for the UAV operations in the context of collision avoidance systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Reference25 articles.

1. Abdallah, R. (2019), “Reliability approaches in networked systems: application on unmanned aerial vehicles”, Part of PhD thesis, University of Bourgogne – Franche-Comté, Besançon, p. 72.

2. Reliability analysis using fault tree analysis: a review;International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications,2013

3. EASA (2016), “UAS safety risk portfolio and analysis”, available at: www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/general-publications/uas-safety-risk-portfolio-and-analysis (accessed 21 March 2021).

4. EASA (2021), “Easy access rules for unmanned aircraft systems”, available at: www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-unmanned-aircraft-systems-regulation-eu (accessed 14 September 2021).

5. Eurocontrol (2006), “Air-Ground communication safety study causes and recommendations”, available at: www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/162 (accessed 21 March 2021).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3