Abstract
PurposeThis paper engages Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Insung Jung in a frank and penetrating conversation that seeks to ground, frame, and problematise research in the field conceptualised as “open, distance and digital education” (ODDE). Taking as starting point the recent publication of the landmark Handbook of Open, Distance, and Digital Education (2022), it segues into a broad critique of the shortcomings of ODDE research, the importance of knowledge production on the meso- and macro-levels, the autonomy of ODDE as a field coming into its own, the place of postfoundationalism in ODDE discourse, and related topics that are pivotal in ODDE today.Design/methodology/approachThe semi-structured interview was employed as the primary qualitative research method.FindingsThe research imperative of the relatively young but complex field of ODDE today is not the incessant reiteration of the same but rather a strategic reorientation that, first, circumvents the well-documented yet too-often-overlooked shortcomings of ODDE research and, second, promotes transboundary collaborations with the potential for system-wide impact.Originality/valueThis novel interview-based critique of ODDE research demonstrates that extending the scholarly discourse beyond the conventional report format is a productive method for enriching conversations on ODDE and vitalising the field itself.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference34 articles.
1. Sandcastle competitions;Distance Education,2016
2. Could interviews be epistemic? An alternative to qualitative opinion polling;Qualitative Inquiry,2007
3. Brinkmann, S. (2013), “Conversations as research: Philosophies of the interview”, in Dennis, B., Carspecken, L. and Carspecken, P.F. (Eds), Qualitative Research: A Reader in Philosophy, Core Concepts, and Practice, Peter Lang, New York, NY, pp. 149-167.
4. Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft vom Fernstudium;Epistolodidaktika,1971
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献