Author:
Probst Barbara,Bucholtz John
Abstract
Purpose
– Thematic coding is a common form of qualitative analysis, yet identification of “codes” can limit understanding by directing the researcher to formulated categories rather than inviting exploration of what else the data may be trying to convey. Since categorization is an essential component of language and can scarcely be avoided, the purpose of this paper is to propose a polyphonic approach as a way to add texture and nuance. In polyphonic coding, text is coded several times along various dimensions of interest; these independently coded versions are then superimposed to identify patterns and relationships, allowing a multi-lensed view of the data as both forest and trees.
Design/methodology/approach
– Polyphonic coding is applied to a specific interview in order to illustrate how the method can be utilized in a three-step process: in vivo coding from several independent perspectives (role, relational movement, and vocal mannerism), merging the perspectives, and “plugging in” to theory.
Findings
– Polyphonic coding reveals relationships among the perspectives that point to an over-arching theme (in the example used) of a struggle for control.
Research limitations/implications
– This approach offers a way to code verbal, tonal, and somatic data as a means of understanding the construction and negotiation of identity in the relational context of qualitative research.
Practical implications
– This approach promotes a flexible, expanded use of data analysis software.
Originality/value
– The metaphor of a musical motet is used to describe a multi-faceted approach to qualitative analysis that can help to mitigate some of the pitfalls of typical thematic coding.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Education
Reference19 articles.
1. Benjamin, J.
(2004), “Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness”,
Psychoanalytic Quarterly
, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 5-46.
2. Ewing, K.P.
(2006), “Revealing and concealing: interpersonal dynamics and the negotiation of identity in the interview”,
Ethos
, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 89-122.
3. Greene, J.C.
(2013), “On rhizome, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages”,
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 749-758.
4. Holloway, W.
(2008), “The importance of relational thinking in the practice of psycho-social research: ontology, epistemology, methodology, and ethics”, in
Clarke, S.
,
Hogget, P.
and
Hahn, H.
(Eds),
Object Relations and Social Relations: The Implications of the Relational turn in Psychoanalysis. Exploring Psychosocial Studies
, Karnac, London, pp. 137-162.
5. MacLure, M.
(2013), “Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology”,
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 658-667.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献