Organic food consumers: what do we really know about them?

Author:

Dimitri Carolyn,Dettmann Rachael L.

Abstract

PurposeThe organic trade literature in the USA makes strong claims about the relationship between income, ethnicity, and other factors and the likelihood of purchasing organic food products. However, previous economic research focusing on the socio‐economic characteristics of organic food consumers yields mixed findings. One explanation for the literature's inconsistent findings is that most studies rely on one specific product or one region of the country, or base their analysis on data collected from in‐store surveys. Another shortcoming in the existing literature is the failure to account for how access to organic food influences the likelihood of buying organic food. This paper's goal is to identify what is known, as well as what is not known, about consumers of organic food.Design/methodology/approachThe paper extends the literature through the combination of a novel approach and unique dataset of US consumers, and addresses the relationship between demographic traits and the likelihood of buying organic food. The dataset consists of primary data recording all purchases of food as well as household demographic data, such as income, education, gender, and ethnicity, over a one‐year period for 44,000 households. The study uses different discrete choice models and multiple product categories to explore the likelihood of buying organic food from many angles, in order to assess the robustness of the statistical relationship between income, education, ethnicity, and other factors on the likelihood of buying organic food, as well as the frequency of buying organic food.FindingsThe results indicate that education has a strong effect on the likelihood of buying organic products, and that the impact of marital status, income, and access to organic are consistent across models. The findings also suggest that further research on the links between ethnicity and consumption of organic food is necessary.Research limitations/implicationsOne possible drawback to this dataset is that older, urban households are overrepresented, in comparison to the entire USA.Practical implicationsThese findings will appeal to those interested in consumer behavior in addition to those interested in organic food consumption, from both the research and trade perspectives. The research indicates that access to organic food is an important determinant of the likelihood of a household buying organic food, the industry in the USA can expand sales by increasing consumer access to organic food.Originality/valueThis paper's unique contribution is the exploration of the robustness of the impact of different factors on the likelihood of buying organic food. The inclusion of access to organic food is also new to the literature, and as expected, households with greater access to organic food are more likely to purchase organic food.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Ai, C. and Norton, E.C. (2003), “Interaction terms in logit and probit models”, Economics Letters, Vol. 80, pp. 123‐9.

2. Alviola, I.V., Pedro, A. and Capps, O. Jr (2010), “Household demand analysis of organic and conventional fluid milk in the United States based on the 2004 Nielsen homescan panel”, Agribusiness, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 369‐88.

3. Baxter, B. (2006), “Who's buying organic?: demographics 2006, hartbeat taking the pulse of the marketplace”, May 17, available at: www.hartman‐group.com/products/HB/2006_05_17.html (accessed 3 August 2006).

4. Chikasada, M. (2007), “Demand for organic milk in the US”, unpublished dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

5. Cicia, G., Del Giudice, T. and Scarpa, R. (2002), “Consumers' perception of quality in organic food: a random utility model under preference heterogeneity and choice correlation from rank‐orderings”, British Food Journal, Vol. 104 Nos 3‐5, pp. 200‐13.

Cited by 119 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3