The scope of safety in English older adult care homes: a qualitative analysis of Safeguarding Adult Reviews

Author:

Smith Nick,Rand Stacey,Morgan Sarah,Jones Karen,Hogan Helen,Dargan Alan

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the content of Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SARs) from older adult care homes to understand how safety is understood and might be measured in practice. Design/methodology/approach SARs relevant to older adult care homes from 2015 onwards were identified via the Social Care Institute of Excellence SARs library. Using thematic analysis, initial inductive coding was mapped to a health-derived safety framework, the Safety Measurement and Monitoring Framework (SMMF). Findings The content of the SARs reflected the dimensions of the SMMF but gaining a deeper understanding of safety in older adult care homes requires additional understanding of how this unique context interacts with these dimensions to create and prevent risks and harms. This review identified the importance of external factors in care home safety. Originality/value This study provides an insight into the scope of safety issues within care homes using the SARs content, and in doing so improves understanding of how it might be measured. The measurement of safety in care homes needs to acknowledge that there are factors external to care homes that a home may have little knowledge of and no ability to control.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference22 articles.

1. From boundary concept to boundary object: the politics and practices of care pathway development;Social Science & Medicine,2009

2. Patient safety culture: a review of the nursing home literature and recommendations for practice;The Annals of Long-Term Care : The Official Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,2008

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

4. Adult safeguarding and the care act (2014) – the impacts on partnerships and practice;The Journal of Adult Protection,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3