Experiment-based validation and uncertainty quantification of coupled multi-scale plasticity models
Author:
Stevens Garrison,Atamturktur Sez,Lebensohn Ricardo,Kaschner George
Abstract
Purpose
– Highly anisotropic zirconium is a material used in the cladding of nuclear fuel rods, ensuring containment of the radioactive material within. The complex material structure of anisotropic zirconium requires model developers to replicate not only the macro-scale stresses but also the meso-scale material behavior as the crystal structure evolves; leading to strongly coupled multi-scale plasticity models. Such strongly coupled models can be achieved through partitioned analysis techniques, which couple independently developed constituent models through an iterative exchange of inputs and outputs. Throughout this iterative process, biases, and uncertainties inherent within constituent model predictions are inevitably transferred between constituents either compensating for each other or accumulating during iterations. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– A finite element model at the macro-scale is coupled in an iterative manner with a meso-scale viscoplastic self-consistent model, where the former supplies the stress input and latter represents the changing material properties. The authors present a systematic framework for experiment-based validation taking advantage of both separate-effect experiments conducted within each constituent’s domain to calibrate the constituents in their respective scales and integral-effect experiments executed within the coupled domain to test the validity of the coupled system.
Findings
– This framework developed is shown to improve predictive capability of a multi-scale plasticity model of highly anisotropic zirconium.
Originality/value
– For multi-scale models to be implemented to support high-consequence decisions, such as the containment of radioactive material, this transfer of biases and uncertainties must be evaluated to ensure accuracy of the predictions of the coupled model. This framework takes advantage of the transparency of partitioned analysis to reduce the accumulation of errors and uncertainties.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science,Modeling and Simulation
Reference61 articles.
1. Atamturktur, S.
,
Hegenderfer, J.
,
Williams, B.
and
Unal, C.
(2015a), “Selection criterion based on an exploration-exploitation approach for optimal design of experiments”,
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
, Vol. 141 No. 1, pp. 04014108-2-9. 2. Atamturktur, S.
,
Liu, Z.
,
Cogan, S.
and
Juang, C.H.
(2014), “Calibration of imprecise and inaccurate numerical models considering fidelity and robustness: a multi-objective optimization based approach”,
Structural and Multi-disciplinary Optimization
, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 659-671. 3. Atamturktur, S.
,
Williams, B.
,
Egeberg, M.
and
Unal, C.
(2013), “Batch sequential design of optimal experiments for improved predictive maturity in physics-based modeling”,
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 549-569. 4. Atamturktur, S.
,
Hegenderfer, J.
,
Williams, B.
,
Egeberg, M.
,
Lebensohn, R.
and
Unal, C.
(2015b), “A resource allocation framework for experiment-based validation of numerical models”,
Journal of Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 641-654. 5. Avramova, M.N.
and
Ivanov, K.N.
(2010), “Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in multi-physics modeling for nuclear reactor design and safety analysis”,
Progress in Nuclear Energy
, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 601-614.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|