Assessing the economic impact of waterfowl hunting in Mississippi
Author:
Santos Xiana T.,Grado Stephen C.,Hunt Kevin M.
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and improve the current methodology of securing and collecting data sources for use in the Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) model to more accurately use, and be able to support, inputs and outputs from economic impact models, specifically those generated by IMPLAN.
Design/methodology/approach
– Primary expenditure data were derived from an extensive mail survey conducted during the 2005-2006 Mississippi waterfowl-hunting season. Survey results were analyzed using the IMPLAN software model default data and comparing it with new, more localized state data that were collected in 2010. Industry sectors were sorted and ranked after analysis based on sector importance to the economy and IMPLAN default data were replaced by localized data.
Findings
– Economic contributions generated from the survey-based default model were $158 million (2010 USD) supporting 1,981 full- and part-time jobs. Economic contributions using survey-based data replacement model were $153 million (2010 USD) supporting 1,517 full- and part-time jobs. Separate model runs of the survey-based data replacement model yielded vastly different results, making the case for changing as many sectors with larger impacts as possible.
Research limitations/implications
– The makeup and components of sectors used and described by the IMPLAN model were at times not clearly labeled which at times hindered the process of comparing and replacing data. It was evident that IMPLAN sectors were too highly aggregated.
Originality/value
– This project will contribute to efforts within Mississippi aimed at protecting and promoting its natural resources for conservation and use for both the private and public sector.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Economics and Econometrics
Reference34 articles.
1. Aruna, P.
,
Cubbage, F.
,
Lee, K.
and
Redmond, C.
(1996), “Regional economic impacts of forestry: who’s in first?”, Proceedings of the March 20-27 Southern Forest Economics Workshop, Gatlinburg, TN, pp. 249-266. 2. Bergstrom, J.C.
,
Cordell, H.K.
,
Watson, A.E.
and
Ashley, G.A.
(1990a), “Economic impacts of recreational visits to state parks in four southern states are estimated using IMPLAN”,
Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics
, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 69-77. 3. Bergstrom, J.C.
,
Cordell, J.K.
,
Ashley, G.A.
and
Watson, A.E.
(1990b), “Economic impacts of recreational spending on rural areas: a case study”,
Economic Development Quarterly
, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 29-39. 4. Bess, R.
and
Ambargis, Z.O.
(2011), “Input-output models for impact analysis: suggestions for practitioners using RIMS II multipliers”, paper presented at 50th Southern Regional Science Association Conference, New Orleans, LA, March 23-27. 5. Bonn, M.A.
and
Harrington, J.
(2008), “A comparison of three economic impact models for applied hospitality and tourism research”,
Tourism Economics
, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 769-789.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|