Author:
Mangan Catherine,Miller Robin,Ward Carol
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of the first stage of a project seeking to improve interprofessional working between general practice and adult social care teams. It develops the current evidence base through findings from focus groups and reflects on the implications of the findings for interprofessional collaboration.
Design/methodology/approach
– The project involved running seven focus groups with general practice staff and adult social work teams to explore their perceptions and understanding of each other.
Findings
– The focus groups highlighted that the negative aspects of interprofessional working outweighed the positives. Negatives included perceptions of different value bases, a lack of knowledge about each others’ roles and responsibilities which resulted in resorting to stereotypes, poor interprofessional communication and a sense of an unspoken professional hierarchy with general practitioners (GPs) at the top leading preventing a culture of appropriate challenge.
Research limitations/implications
– The research has only been conducted with four GP practices and three social work teams that had expressed an interest in improving their interprofessional working. Therefore the findings may not be generalisable.
Practical implications
– The case study suggests that there is a lack of effective interprofessional working between social care teams and general practice. With the current health and social care agenda focused on integration, this suggests there should be a greater focus on this area.
Originality/value
– This paper illustrates that despite many years of policy makers promoting better integration, the quality of the interprofessional collaboration between social care teams and general practice remains poor.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health(social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Barrett, J.
,
Curran, V.
,
Glynn, L.
and
Godwin, M.
(2007),
CHSRF Synthesis: Interprofessional Collaboration and Quality Primary Healthcare
, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Ottawa.
2. Carpenter, J.
and
Dickinson, H.
(2014),
Interprofessional Education and Training
, The Policy Press.
3. D’Amour, D.
and
Oandasan, I.
(2005), “Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 8-20.
4. Drinka, T.J.K.
,
Miller, T.F.
and
Goodman, B.M.
(1996), “Characterizing motivational styles of professionals who work on interdisciplinary healthcare teams”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 51-61.
5. Farrell, M.P.
,
Schmitt, M.H.
and
Heinemann, G.D.
(2001), “Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 281-295.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献