Employee perceived effects of workplace health promotion

Author:

Nöhammer Elisabeth,Schusterschitz Claudia,Stummer Harald

Abstract

PurposeThe employees’ perspective is often disregarded in research regarding workplace health promotion (WHP). Experts’ opinions are prominent, stating employees’ benefits of WHP on the physical, mental, and social level. The purpose of this paper is to investigate which benefits and effects employees expect from WHP.Design/methodology/approachAs a current qualitative study indicates that employees also highlight cognitive aspects and prevention issues, a quantitative verification of this extended model was conducted. A questionnaire consisting of items derived from a qualitative study was developed and distributed in Austria in two government agencies, one bank, and one NGO. The sample consists of 237 employees rating the appreciability of potential WHP effects.FindingsBased on a principal component analysis, employee‐perceived effects of WHP were grouped into four components. Within the first, cognitive one, the most frequently perceived effect (40.1 per cent) was giving WHP a try. Regarding the second, emotional component, feeling appreciated (57.4 per cent) was emphasized. Improved affordability of prevention (57.0 per cent) belongs to the third, convenience/pleasure component. Effects in the fourth, social realm, such as better contact with colleagues, were perceived by only 17.4 per cent.Research limitations/implicationsThe results enlarge the theoretical grouping of WHP effects but require further testing regarding blue‐collar employees, and physical benefits.Practical implicationsStrengthening factors referring to perceived benefits in practical WHP design plus related communication seems advisable to increase participation rates and benefits derived.Originality/valueProviding an enlargement to current models of employee perceived benefits regarding WHP, this paper gives suggestions for a benefit oriented WHP program and communication design and opens up new paths for research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference31 articles.

1. Anderson, D.R., Serxner, S.A. and Gould, D.B. (2001), “Conceptual framework, critical questions, and practical challenges in conducting research on the financial impact of worksite health promotion”, American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 281‐8.

2. Badura, B. and Hehlmann, T. (2003), Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik. Der Weg zur gesunden Organisation, Springer, Berlin.

3. Bödeker, W. and Hüsing, T. (2008), IGA‐Barometer 2 Welle. Einschätzungen der Erwerbsbevölkerung zum Stellenwert der Arbeit, zur Verbreitung und Akzeptanz von betrieblicher Prävention und zur krankheitsbedingten Beeinträchtigung der Arbeit – 2007, BKK BV, DGUV, AOK‐BV and AEV, Essen, Dresden, Bonn and Siegburg, available at: www.iga‐info.de/fileadmin/texte/iga_report_12.pdf (accessed 7 May 2010).

4. Breucker, G. (2000), “Gesundheitsförderung – Zum Wohle von Unternehmen und Mitarbeitern”, Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht, Vol. 6, pp. 240‐6.

5. Breucker, G. and Schröer, A. (2000), “Settings 1: effective health promotion in the workplace”, in ECSC‐EC‐EAEC (Ed.), The Evidence of Health Promotion Effectiveness. Shaping Public Health in a New Europe, 2nd ed., ECSC‐EC‐EAEC, Brussels, pp. 98‐109, available at: www.iuhpe.org/uploaded/Publications/Books_Reports/EHP_part2.pdf (accessed 7 May 2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3