Employees and sustainability: the role of incentives
Author:
Merriman Kimberly K,Sen Sagnika,Felo Andrew J,Litzky Barrie E
Abstract
Purpose
– Organizational sustainability has become a priority on many corporate agendas. How to integrate sustainability efforts throughout the organization, however, remains a challenge. The purpose of this paper is to examine two factors that potentially enhance incentive effects on employee engagement in environmental objectives: explicit organizational values for sustainability and the performance objective’s complementarity with incented financial objectives.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors employed a quasi-experimental design in which participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions, including a status quo condition against which the treatments were contrasted. Participants (n=400) were comprised of a cross-section of US employees from a wide range of occupations and industries. A post hoc qualitative analysis provided additional insights.
Findings
– Incentive effects were enhanced (i.e. preference for the environmental objective was significantly higher) when the environmental project offered complementary benefits for financial objectives, but not when organization values emphasized sustainability. An entrenched status quo bias for financial performance was discerned among a subset of the sample.
Research limitations/implications
– Management scholars must pay close attention to the role of implicit norms for financial performance when investigating employee engagement in organizational sustainability efforts. From an applied perspective, framing sustainability objectives to emphasize financial benefits consistent with a financial mission may maximize employee engagement.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to understanding of organizational sustainability efforts at the individual employee level of analysis, a conspicuously small part of the organizational research surrounding this topic.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference54 articles.
1. Amabile, T.M.
,
Hill, K.G.
,
Hennessey, B.A.
and
Tighe, E.M.
(1994), “The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 950-967. 2. Aguinis, H.
and
Glavas, A.
(2013), “Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: psychological foundations”,
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 314-332. 3. Baker, G.
,
Gibbons, R.
and
Murphy, K.J.
(2002), “Relational contracts and the theory of the firm”,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
, Vol. 117 No. 1, pp. 39-84. 4. Baker, T.
,
Tsihrintzis, V.A.
,
Munroe, N.
and
Ruiz, L.
(1995), “Implementing a teaching incentive program, thought and action”,
NEA Higher Education Journal, Thought and Action
, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 23-41. 5. Bansal, P.
(2003), “From issues to action: the importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues”,
Organization Science
, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 510-527.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|