Marketized employment services

Author:

Gallet Wilma

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the challenges confronting Christian-based organisations operating in the employment services quasi-market in Australia. It focuses on the tensions that arise for these organisations as they endeavour to deliver services that reflect their distinctive mission and values, while remaining competitive in an environment characterised by the typical market values of commercialism, competition and compliance. Design/methodology/approach – The data on which this paper is based has been derived from 48 semi-structured interviews with church leaders, senior managers and frontline staff in four Christian-based organisations. Findings – The paper demonstrates that the Christian-based organisations under consideration are constrained in their ability to deliver a distinctive and holistic mission. The pressure to survive has resulted in these organisations emulating the business practices of others considered to be more successful in the field. Research limitations/implications – This paper draws attention to the commercialisation that has occurred within Christian-based organisations delivering privatised employment services. As markets are formed in other welfare areas, further research opportunities will present to examine how Christian-based organisations respond to the pressures that arise in these fields. Practical implications – The findings from this study raise significant questions for Christian-based organisations. The particular dilemma being whether they should accept government funding in circumstances where their mission is likely to be compromised. Originality/value – This paper serves to highlight, that despite their intentions to deliver a distinctive mission, Christian-based organisations are indistinguishable from other organisations delivering privatised employment services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference50 articles.

1. Anheier, H.K. (2009), “What kind of nonprofit sector, what kind of society? Comparative policy reflections”, American Behavioral Scientist , Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 1082-1094. doi: 10.1177/0002764208327676.

2. Australian JobSearch (2014), “MAX employment”, available at: https://jobsearch.gov.au/provider/ProviderSiteDetails.aspx?Tab=1 & Tab2=1 & SiteCode=NDZZ & ProviderType=SSC & PostCode= & LocationCode=4NOS & Specialties= & State= & Speciality=1 & IsAll=1 & SpecialtyType=AALL & SpecialtyType2 (accessed 12 January 2015).

3. Ayton, D. , Carey, G. , Keleher, H. and Smith, B. (2012), “Historical overview of church involvement in health and wellbeing in Australia: implications for health promotion partnerships”, Australian Journal of Primary Health , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 4-10.

4. Backman, E.V. and Smith, S.R. (2000), “Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities?”, Nonprofit Management and Leadership , Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 355-373.

5. Bessant, J. , Watts, R. , Dalton, T. and Smyth, P. (2006), Talking Policy How Social Policy is Made , Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3