Author:
Kool Dennis de,Bekkers Victor
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate the perceived value-relevance of open data published by the Dutch Inspectorate of Education in the parents’ choice of Dutch primary schools.
Design/methodology/approach
– Empirical data were collected through a mixed method strategy including quantitative and qualitative methods: quantitative surveys among parents of pupils in 25 primary schools; and semi-structured in-depth interviews using a topic list.
Findings
– Parents make little use of the Inspectorate’s website compared to other information sources. The perceived usefulness of this website to parents choosing a primary school is also relatively low. Personal information gathered by school visits, written information from schools and information from other parents are more important sources.
Research limitations/implications
– Subjective considerations, such as the atmosphere and ambience of a school, play an important role in parents’ choice behavior. Pragmatic considerations also play a role, such as a school’s nearness. This study shows that it is necessary to rethink the rational assumptions behind publishing performance data.
Practical implications
– This study observed a mismatch between the demand and supply of open data about primary schools. The Inspectorate’s publication strategy is based on “hard” and “written” data presented on a website, but parents also appreciate “soft” and personal “oral” data. Parents state that the Inspectorate should not only focus on negative school results for censuring (“naming and shaming”), but also give attention to schools that perform well (“naming and faming”).
Originality/value
– Research about parents’ and citizens’ use of quality information in general is scarce. These findings show that parents’ choice behavior is less rational than assumed. Relativistic notions about decision-making processes are recognized in other studies also, but they suggest that highly educated parents are over-represented in the group of parents who actively make school choices, whereas this study found no indications that parents’ educational level affects their choices.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference40 articles.
1. Andrews, R.
and
van de Walle, S.
(2013), “New public management and citizens’ perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness”,
Public Management Review
, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 762-783.
2. Askim, J.
(2009), “The demand side of performance measurement: explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking”,
International Public Management Journal
, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 24-47.
3. Bagley, C.
,
Woods, P.A.
and
Glatter, R.
(2001), “Rejecting schools: towards a fuller understanding of the process of parental choice”,
School Leadership and Management
, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 309-325.
4. Bekkers, V.J.J.M.
and
Homburg, V.M.F.
(2002), “Administrative supervision and information relations”,
Information Infrastructure and Policy
, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 1-13.
5. Buckley, J.
and
Schneider, M.
(2003), “Shopping for schools: how do marginal consumers gather information about schools?”,
The Policy Studies Journal
, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 121-145.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献