Performance and political skill in personal reputation assessments

Author:

Dana Laird Mary,Zboja James J.,Martinez Arthur D.,Ferris Gerald R.

Abstract

PurposeReputation has many positive outcomes, but little is known about how individuals manage their personal reputation at work. This study aims to investigate the relationships between job performance and political skill on personal reputation.Design/methodology/approachNinety‐eight triads from a Midwestern manufacturer provided data. Employees rated their political skill, supervisors rated the employees' job performance, and coworkers rated the employees' personal reputation. The white‐collar respondents were mostly Caucasian, female, middle aged, and moderately tenured in their position. The data were analyzed with regression analysis.FindingsThe results illustrated positive political skill‐personal reputation and job performance ‐personal reputation relationships. Job performance was positively associated with personal reputation for politically skilled employees, but not for individuals low in political skill.Research limitations/implicationsJob performance was evaluated by employees' supervisors, but less subjective, quantitative measures of job performance would be helpful.Practical implicationsPolitical skill training and/or mentoring relationships may help individuals manage their personal reputation at work.Social implicationsThis study focused on personal reputation in a work environment. However, the results also may be useful to individuals in a variety of organizations (e.g. schools, clubs, churches).Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies to investigate how individuals manage their personal reputation in a work setting. Unlike previous research that used self‐evaluations of personal reputation, this study uses peer evaluations, which is more appropriate for the construct.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference56 articles.

1. Aiken, L. and West, S. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

2. Alreck, P.L. and Settle, R.B. (1995), The Survey Research Handbook: Guidelines and Strategies for Conducting a Survey, Irwin Professional Publishing, New York, NY.

3. Anderson, C. and Shirako, A. (2008), “Are individuals' reputations related to their history of behavior?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 94, pp. 320‐333.

4. Andrasik, F. and Heimberg, J.S. (1982), “Self‐management procedures”, in Fredrickson, L.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 219‐247.

5. Becker, T.S. (1998), “Integrity in organizations: beyond honesty and conscientiousness”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 154‐161.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3