Creativity in cross-domain collaborations: searching factors to increase efficiency

Author:

Sik Attila

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine how different disciplines and sectors approach creativity, and how to improve cross-domain collaboration efficiency. Creativity is one of the most important factors that hugely contributes to the growth of economy, and the key to the modern organisation’s survival. There are considerable differences between disciplines regarding how they approach creativity since each discipline has a methodology which is designed to develop new ideas. Specialisation of disciplines can create difficulties when they start to interact in collaborations. Differences between sectors (Industry, Academia, Arts and Public) in definition of creativity, creativity measurement, management and collaboration motivators can hinder cross-sector collaboration efficiency. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire was distributed over the Internet, and statistical tests were performed to find differences between groups how they view various dimensions of creativity. Findings – By analysing various disciplines, the study revealed significant differences between the reward system, the creativity measurement, the required management support and the way how various disciplines solve complex problems. Sector analysis revealed significant differences in creativity quantification, personal traits, sensitivity to idea ownership, composition and size of the ideal team, communication and incentives to increase creativity. Research limitations/implications – In this study, only Internet users were sampled, and the majority of respondent were from Europe working in academic environment. Practical implications – Misalignment of forces between disciplines causes inefficient cross- and multi-disciplinary collaborations, while inter-sector misalignment results in unproductive inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary teamwork. Special emphasis has to be placed on external factor, creativity measurement and collaboration motivator adjustment that were the most misaligned across the analysed groups. Originality/value – The study indicates that to increase collaboration, efficiency factors that were scrutinised in this project have to be aligned across disciplines and sectors.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference56 articles.

1. Amabile, T. (1988), “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations”, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior , Jai Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 123-167.

2. Amabile, T. (1998), “How to kill creativity”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 77-88.

3. Amabile, T. , Conti, H. , Coon, H. , Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 1154-1184.

4. Bruns, H. (2009), “Composing synthesis: developing knowledge in cross-domain collaboration”, Doctoral Dissertation , Boston University, Boston, MA.

5. Bruns, H.C. (2013), “Working alone together: coordination in collaboration accross domains of expertise”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 62-83.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3