Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to present the combination of enterprise risk management (ERM) and value-based management as especially suitable methods for companies with a shareholder value imperative. Among its major benefits, these methods make the contribution of risk management for business decisions more effective.Design/methodology/approachAny possible inconsistencies between ERM, generating value because of imperfect capital markets and the CAPM to calculate cost of capital, which assumes perfect markets, must be avoided. Therefore, it is imperative that valuation methods used are based on risk analysis, and thus do not require perfect capital markets.FindingsValue-based risk management requires the impact of changes in risk on enterprise value to be calculated and the aggregation of opportunities and risks related to planning to calculate total risk (using Monte Carlo simulation) and valuation techniques that reflect the effects changes in risk, on probability of default, cost of capital and enterprise value (and do not assume perfect capital markets). It is recommended that all relevant risks should be quantified and described using adequate probability distributions derived from the best information.Practical implicationsThis approach can help to improve the use of risk analysis in decision-making by improving existing risk-management systems.Originality/valueThis extension of ERM is outlined to provide risk-adequate evaluation methods for business decisions, using Monte Carlo simulation and recently developed methods for risk–fair valuation with incomplete replication in combination with the probability of default. It is shown that quantification of all risk using available information should be accepted for the linking of risk analysis and business decisions.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference78 articles.
1. Why do firms reduce business risk?;Academy of Management Journal,1990
2. The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management accounting;Organizations and Society,2010
3. Quality minus junk;Review of Accounting Studies,2019
4. Baule, R. (2018), “The cost of debt Capital revisited”, Business Research, 18 August 2018, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40685-018-0070-6 (accessed 30 July 2019).
5. A risk/return-paradox for strategic management;Sloan Management Review,1980
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献