Knowledge management implementation in a library

Author:

Kumar Agarwal Naresh,Anwarul Islam Md

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the study is to investigate the tools/technologies that would be of value to libraries as they implement knowledge management (KM) and to map these to different phases of the KM cycle. Design/methodology/approach – Models of the KM cycle and theories related to information technology (IT) adoption were reviewed, along with tools/technologies for collaboration and KM. A theoretical “model for KM tools and their adoption in libraries” was arrived at. Findings – It was found that there is no single set of tools that would be applicable to everyone or across libraries. In addition, technology is just an enabler for KM. Therefore, a comprehensive set of tools, both physical and technological, is presented. Research limitations/implications – The paper provides a practical, one-stop place for librarians to decide on KM methods and tools based on their unique environments. The proposed model for KM tools should guide further research. Originality/value – Most studies on KM have been outside libraries. Of all KM tool studies, there is a lack of a single paper that puts together the majority of tools/technologies (whether IT or non-IT-based) that would help library staff make informed decisions. The primary research contribution is a model for KM tools and their adoption in libraries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference50 articles.

1. Abell, A. and Oxbrow, N. (2001), Competing With Knowledge: The Information Professionals in the Knowledge Management Age, Library Association Publishing, London.

2. Agarwal, N.K. and Poo, D.C.C. (2008), “Capturing tacit knowledge across different domains: Knowledge Community (K-Comm)”, in Mitra, A. (Ed), International Journal of Business Information Systems (IJBIS), Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 668-685.

3. Allee, V. (1997), “Twelve principles of knowledge management”, Training and Development, Vol. 51 No. 11, pp. 71-74.

4. Andrew, P. (2009), “21st century library systems”, Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 49 No. 6, pp. 641-650.

5. Awad, E.M. and Ghaziri, H.M. (2004), Knowledge Management, Pearson, NJ.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3