Recombining national variety: internationalisation strategies of American and European law firms

Author:

Quack Sigrid

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore internationalisation strategies of service firms in sectors where markets become increasingly globalised while resource environments still remain distinctively shaped by national institutions.Design/methodology/approachA theoretical framework is proposed that suggests that the more firms expand their business activities across borders by building up offices abroad or merging with firms from other countries, the more likely they are to embrace recombinant strategies to blend elements of different societal legacies. Subsequently, a comparative case study of internationalisation strategies, governance modes and organisational forms of European and US law firms is presented to illustrate the value of the framework, followed by the analysis of a novel data set on multi‐jurisdictional qualifications of partners in these international law firms.FindingsBy virtue of their integrative organisational model and mobilisation of versatile legal competences, large pan‐European law firms are challenging the dominance of US law firms in international legal markets, while the latter in response are revising their own previous export‐oriented internationalisation strategy.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study provides a starting point for further research on internationalisation in service industries.Originality/valueThe framework is useful to expand effect societal analysis to dynamic international environments.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference57 articles.

1. (The) American Lawyer (2007), October.

2. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

3. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghosal, S. (2000), Transnational Management. Texts, Cases, and Readings in Cross‐Border Management, 3rd ed., McGraw‐Hill Higher Education, Singapore.

4. Brock, D.M. (2006), “The changing professional organization: a review of competing archetypes”, International Journal of Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 157‐74.

5. Buijink, W.F.J., Maijoor, S.J., Meuwissen, R. and van Witteloostuijn, A. (1996), The Role, Position and Liability of the Statutory Auditor within the European Union, European Union (DG XV), Brussels.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3