Individual differences in risk attitude among managers: a multilevel approach

Author:

Ceschi Andrea,Dusi Matilde,Ferrara Michela,Tommasi Francesco,Sartori Riccardo

Abstract

Purpose The way in which managers differ when confronted with risky options or when evaluating different alternatives constitutes a fundamental part of organizational risk management. This study aims to investigate how managerial risk-taking attitudes (i.e. ethical and financial risk-taking as a trade-off between benefit and riskiness) change over time and based on gender. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a cross-sectional study on a sample of Italian executives and measured their perceptions of risk-taking, risk perception and risk-benefit, all referring to the company they worked for in the ethical and financial domain. The study also collected demographic data to gather information on age and gender. The authors analyzed data collected using multilevel analysis. Findings The results show that perceived benefits are the main drivers of risk-taking attitudes in both domains. Age and gender are not significant direct predictors of risk, but interactions with domains reveal insightful patterns. Originality/value Overall, this study highlights the need to assess the whole pattern of relationships emerging from the range of situational variables characterizing a specific population. Concerning the organizational context, it means addressing the role of organizational variables in influencing risk-taking so as to determine the extent to which organizational policies are indeed effective in fostering efficient organizational risk management.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference58 articles.

1. Baby boom, population aging, and capital markets;The Journal of Business,1994

2. Barton, K. (2016), “MuMIn: multi-model inference”, R package version 1.15.6, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

3. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

4. A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations;Judgment and Decision Making,2006

5. Age differences in risk: perceptions, intentions and domains;Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3