Non‐agricultural databases and thesauri

Author:

Bartol Tomaz

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to assess the utility of non‐agriculture‐specific information systems, databases, and respective controlled vocabularies (thesauri) in organising and retrieving agricultural information. The purpose is to identify thesaurus‐linked tree structures, controlled subject headings/terms (heading words, descriptors), and principal database‐dependent characteristics and assess how controlled terms improve retrieval results (recall) in relation to free‐text/uncontrolled terms in abstracts and document titles.Design/methodology/approachSeveral different hosts (interfaces, platforms, portals) and databases were used: CSA Illumina (ERIC, LISA), Ebscohost (Academic Search Complete, Medline, Political Science Complete), Ei‐Engineering Village (Compendex, Inspec), OVID (PsycINFO), ProQuest (ABI/Inform Global). The search‐terms agriculture and agricultural and truncated word‐stem agricultur‐ were employed. Permuted (rotated index) search fields were used to retrieve terms from thesauri. Subject‐heading search was assessed in relation to free‐text search, based on abstracts and document titles.FindingsAll thesauri contain agriculture‐based headings; however, associative, hierarchical and synonymous relationships show important inter‐database differences. Using subject headings along with abstracts and titles in search syntax (query) sometimes improves retrieval by up to 60 per cent. Retrieval depends on search fields and database‐specifics, such as autostemming (lemmatization), explode function, word‐indexing, or phrase‐indexing.Research limitations/implicationsInter‐database and host comparison, on consistent principles, can be limited because of some particular host‐ and database‐specifics.Practical implicationsEnd‐users may exploit databases more competently and thus achieve better retrieval results in searching for agriculture‐related information.Originality/valueThe function of as many as ten databases in different disciplines in providing information relevant to subject matter that is not a topical focus of databases is assessed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference28 articles.

1. Anghelescu, H.G.B., Yuan, X. and Zhang, X. (2005), “Domain knowledge, search behaviour, and search effectiveness of engineering and science students: an exploratory study”, Information Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 1‐20.

2. Bandyopadhyay, A. (2010), “Examining biological abstracts on two platforms: what do end users need to know?”, Science & Technology Libraries, Vol. 29 Nos 1‐2, pp. 34‐52.

3. Bartol, T. (2009), “Assessment of classification and indexing of an agricultural journal based on metadata in AGRIS and CAB Abstracts databases”, International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 4‐12.

4. Bartol, T. and Hocevar, M. (2005), “The capital cities in the ten new European Union countries in selected bibliographic databases”, Scientometrics, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 173‐87.

5. Brown, J.D. (2003), “The ERIC database: a comparison of four versions”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 154‐74.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3