Author:
Ruuskanen Petri,Selander Kirsikka,Anttila Timo
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to study the perceived job quality and job satisfaction among third-sector employees and compare job quality in the third, public and private sector.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study is based on the quality of work life (QWL) survey data gathered by Statistics Finland. The QWL data are complemented with data set collected among third-sector employees. In the sector comparisons percentage shares were used to compare different dimensions of job quality between the sectors. Regression analysis was used to control the structural labour market differences between the sectors.
Findings
– The results show that job quality in the third sector differs substantially from that in both the public and private sectors. Employees in the third sector are less satisfied with their jobs than others. They perceive their work more autonomous than others. Compared to private-sector employees, third-sector employees perceive their jobs as less insecure. They also report more intensity and qualitative insecurity than employees in other sectors.
Research limitations/implications
– The sample consist only trade union members. The generalisability of results to non-unionized employees may be limited.
Originality/value
– Previously it has been stated that third-sector employees enjoy greater job satisfaction due to intrinsic work benefits related to non-profit work. There is, however, small number of empirical studies trying to compare systematically job quality between the sectors. The present analysis contradicts the previous findings of higher job satisfaction in the third sector.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference46 articles.
1. Alapuro, R.
and
Stenius, H.
(Eds) (2010),
Nordic Associations in a European Perspective
, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
2. Almond, S.
and
Kendall, J.
(2000), “Taking the employees’ perspective seriously: an initial United Kingdom cross-sectoral comparison”,
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 205-231.
3. Appelbaum, E.
,
Bailey, T.
,
Berg, P.
and
Kalleberg, A.L.
(2000),
Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off
, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
4. Ascoli, U.
and
Ranci, C.
(2002), “The context of new social policies in Europe”, in
Ascoli, U.
and
Ranci, C.
(Eds),
Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix. The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization
, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 1-24.
5. Benz, M.
(2005), “Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction? Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms”,
Kyklos
, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 155-176.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献