Abstract
PurposeThe authors aim to examine the relationship between home bias and globalization while specifically examining the effects of the different dimensions of globalization (social, economic and political) for both developed countries and developing countries. Additionally, the authors test the effect of globalization regulation and laws against actual globalization activities.Design/methodology/approachThis study investigates the influence of globalization on the home bias phenomenon using a panel regression and a three-dimensional globalization index (social, economic and political globalization) of 42 developed and developing countries from 2001 to 2016.FindingsThe results show that globalization significantly reduces home bias. In addition, the authors find that social globalization has a key influence compared to economic globalization and that political globalization has the weakest effect. For developing economies only, economic globalization as well as globalization laws and regulations have a crucial impact on the level of home bias.Originality/valuePrior studies focus merely on the aspect of financial integration. Our study provides a more comprehensive outlook by distinguishing between the features of globalization (social, economic and political) as well as the actual globalization activities (de facto) compared to the laws and regulations enabling those actives (de jure). Lauterbach and Reisman (2004) show that globalization reduces home bias through a theoretical model. This study provides empirical merit to their work. In addition, we examine the different aspects of globalization for both emerging and developed markets.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference54 articles.
1. Information costs and home bias: an analysis of U.S. holdings of foreign equities;Journal of International Economics,2004
2. Amadi, A.A. (2004), “Equity home bias: a disappearing phenomenon?”. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.540662.
3. Cultural influences on home bias and international diversification by Institutional Investors;Journal of Banking & Finance,2011
4. Model uncertainty, financial market integration and the home bias puzzle;Journal of International Money and Finance,2007
5. Barberis, N. (2010), “Psychology and the financial crisis of 2007-2008”, in Haliassos, M. (Ed.), Financial Innovation and the Crisis, MIT Press, Massachusetts, Vol. 60, pp. 1495-1534, forthcoming Journal of Finance.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献