Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to perform a critical analysis of the relationship between small- and medium-sized social enterprises (SMSEs) and banks. Based on the conceptual framework for the analysis of SME’s credit availability developed by Berger and Udell (2006), this study aims to contribute to the current debate in two ways: first, outlining the characteristics of the lending technologies currently used by banks and financial institutions to evaluate SMSEs when they apply for credit; and second, discussing, based on the results of the empirical analysis, the coherence of these systems from the social ecosystem perspective and identifying areas for possible improvement.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper develops a conceptual framework based on the model proposed by Berger and Udell (2006), which defines the characteristics of lending technologies that banks use to evaluate SMEs, and applies it to the case of SMSEs. To study the interplay of these lending technologies, the empirical analysis is based on a case study of five Italian banks. Data are collected from multiple sources to capture key dimensions of the problems analyzed.
Findings
The paper provides empirical insight about the relationship between SMSEs and banks. The Italian case shows that the current lending infrastructure must be revised to support SMSE credit availability, and government policies affect the national financial institution structure. The relationship between SMSEs and Italian banks remains underdeveloped.
Social implications
The research supports the scaling up of social business.
Originality/value
This paper fulfills an identified need to study how social enterprises credit access can be enabled.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference47 articles.
1. The financing structure of social enterprises: conflicts and implications;International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing,2014
2. Performance measurement for social enterprises;VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,2015
3. Social impact bonds: blockbuster or flash in a pan?;International Journal of Public Administration,2016
4. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?;Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006
5. Measuring performance in social enterprises;Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2011
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献