Internet use increases the odds of using the public library

Author:

Vakkari Pertti

Abstract

PurposeThe functional equivalence hypothesis suggests that a new communication medium will replace those activities that most closely perform the same functions for users as did the established media. There is scarce empirical evidence whether use of the internet displaces use of the public library. This survey aims to explore how the use of the internet is associated with the use of the public library for studying, work and business, everyday activities, and leisure activities. The author also studies which factors in addition to internet use predict the use of public libraries for these purposes.Design/methodology/approachThe data is based on a nationwide representative survey of the adult population in Finland aged 15‐79. The author used binary logistic regression analysis for modelling and predicting library use.FindingsThe results show that the use of the internet is positively associated with the use of public libraries. Those using the internet tend also to use the public library. Thus, the use of the internet does not replace the use of the public library, but merely complements it. It is found that the frequency of internet use and the number of books read are the strongest predictors of public library use.Originality/valueThis is the first study to show that the use of the internet for studying, work and business, everyday activities, and leisure activities is not replacing public library use for the same purposes, but merely complementing it.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference26 articles.

1. Agresti, A. (1996), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY.

2. Becker, S., Crandall, M., Fisher, K., Kinney, B., Landry, C. and Rocha, A. (2010), Opportunity for all, IMLS, Washington, DC, available at: www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Pages/us‐libraries‐report‐opportunity‐for‐all.aspx (accessed 1 August 2011).

3. Berelson, B. (1950), The Library's Public, 3rd ed., Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

4. Black, T.R. (1999), Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics, Sage Publications, London.

5. Buente, W. and Robbin, A. (2008), “Trends in internet behavior, 2000‐2004”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 11, pp. 1743‐60.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3