Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this article is to study a locally‐oriented and book‐based research field using two Swedish language sources. Knowledge about citation patterns outside journal‐based, English language databases is scarce; thus a substantial part of research in the humanities and the social sciences is neglected in bibliometric studies.Design/methodology/approachCitation characteristics (publication type, language, gender and age) in the journal Tidskrift för Litteraturvetenskap (2000‐2009) and in grant applications (2006‐2009) are studied. The datasets are analyzed further, adopting an author‐co‐citation approach for depicting and comparing the “intellectual base” of the field.FindingsIt is shown that monographs and anthologies are the main publication channel in Swedish literary research. English, followed by Swedish, is the major language, and the gender of authors seems to influence citation practices. Furthermore, a common intellectual base of literary studies that is independent of publication type and language could be identified.Practical implicationsBibliometric analysis of fields within the humanities needs to go beyond established databases and materials. The extensive use of recent English language monographs in Swedish literary studies informs the acquisition policy of university libraries serving literature scholars.Originality/valueCitation analysis of non‐English sources offers further knowledge about scholarly fields with a local and “rural” profile. The approach of using references in grant applications provides a novel and promising venue for bibliometric research.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference43 articles.
1. Adams, J. and Testa, J. (2011), “Thomson Reuters Book Citation Index”, in Noyons, E., Ngulube, P. and Leta, J. (Eds), The 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, South Africa, Vol. I, pp. 13‐18.
2. Ardanauy, J., Urbano, C. and Quintana, L. (2009), “Citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974‐2003): towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 347‐66.
3. Becher, T. and Trowler, P.R. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Open University Press, Buckingham.
4. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L. and Van den Besselaar, P. (2010), “A meta‐evaluation of scientific research proposals: different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 211‐20.
5. Boyack, K.W. and Börner, K. (2003), “Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 447‐61.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献