Fuzzy sets and the organization of literary texts: a conceptualization and two‐stage pilot study

Author:

Paling Stephen

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe a conceptualization and two‐stage pilot study that explores ways in which fuzzy sets can be used to measure the indexability of literary texts.Design/methodology/approachParticipants provided a subject description for each in a series of literary and nonliterary texts. Each participant was also randomly assigned to one of three tasks: using a visual analog scale to rate the clarity of each text, using a visual analog scale to rate the confidence each participant felt in describing the subject of each text, or sorting the texts from most to least clear without the use of a visual analog scale. Nonparametric statistics and qualitative analysis were used to analyze the data.FindingsParticipants and coders used the visual analog scales successfully. The participants perceived literary texts as less clear than nonliterary texts, and expressed less confidence in their subject description of literary texts than in their descriptions of literary texts. The study found preliminary support for the idea that fuzzy sets can provide a useful theoretical basis for examining the indexability of texts.Originality/valueA measure of the indexability of literary texts could help provide sound theoretical guidance for construction of tools to organize those texts. A structured comparison of literary and nonliterary texts could help to build a theoretical base from which to make practical decisions about whether and how to perform subject analysis on each type of text.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference51 articles.

1. ALA (2000), Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, etc., American Library Association, Chicago, IL.

2. Barthes, R. (1974), S/Z, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.

3. Barthes, R. (1975), The Pleasure of the Text, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.

4. Beghtol, C. (1994), The Classification of Fiction: The Development of a System Based on Theoretical Principles, Scarecrow, Metuchen, NJ.

5. Bensman, S.J. (2001), “Bradford's law and fuzzy sets: statistical implications for library analyses”, IFLA Journal, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 238‐46.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3