Document theory for the design of socio‐technical systems

Author:

Ivar Olsen Bernt,Windfeld Lund Niels,Ellingsen Gunnar,Hartvigsen Gunnar

Abstract

PurposeThis conceptual article aims to discuss how the concept of a document and documentation along with a general document model could inform us in the design and engineering of information or rather documentation systems.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents a broad and complementary document model, derived from the last couple of decades' discussion on what is a document and what is documentation. This model is used as a basis for a method, a conceptual tool or a template for analysis of socio‐technical systems.FindingsThe authors contend that the document systems analysis is a holistic approach compared to the traditional systems design and engineering reductionist approach, and also in the context of sociotechnical systems design. The document model is a taxonomy of the constituents of the document and, the authors argue, a potential communication tool in systems design.Research limitations/implicationsThe document model presented in this article is discussed more or less solely in the context of information systems design, specifically sociotechnical systems. Moreover, the authors have tried to fit the theory and model within this context here, even though the concepts and thoughts can have much more general implications.Practical implicationsThis presentation of a novel document model and framework is presented as a potential tool for systems analysis and design. The authors regard this as a realistic vision for the framework, but at the current stage of development for the model it is probably more useful as draft for such a tool or framework; a point of departure for the discussion of practical – and theoretical – implications of a broad and holistic document model.Originality/valueA novel, unpublished document model, derived from theoretical discourses of document ontology in the “neo‐documentalist” movement spawned from a particular research community in Tromsø, Norway, is presented and discussed in the light of information systems design.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference70 articles.

1. Bannon, L. and Bødker, S. (1991), “Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use”, Cambridge Series On Human‐Computer Interaction, pp. 227‐53.

2. Bannon, L.J. and Schmidt, K. (1989), “CSCW: four characters in search of a context”, Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (EC‐CSCW '89), pp. 358‐72.

3. Bardram, J.E. (1997), “I love the system – I just don't use it!”, Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work: The Integration Challenge, ACM Press, Phoenix, AZ.

4. Beck, K. (2000), Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison‐Wesley Longman, Glen View, IL.

5. Berg, M. (1999), “Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 55, pp. 87‐101.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3