Conceptual misfits in e‐mail‐based current‐awareness interaction

Author:

Attfield Simon,Blandford Ann

Abstract

PurposeThis research aims to identify some requirements for supporting user interactions with electronic current‐awareness alert systems based on data from a professional work environment.Design/methodology/approachQualitative data were gathered using contextual inquiry observations with 21 workers at the London office of an international law firm. The analysis uses CASSM (“Concept‐based Analysis of Surface and Structural Misfits”), a usability evaluation method structured around identifying mismatches, or “misfits”, between user‐concepts and concepts represented within a system.FindingsParticipants were frequently overwhelmed by e‐mail alerts, and a key requirement is to support efficient interaction. Several misfits, which act as barriers to efficient reviewing and follow‐on activities, are demonstrated. These relate to a lack of representation of key user‐concepts at the interface and/or within the system, including alert items and their properties, source documents, “back‐story”, primary sources, content categorisations and user collections.Research limitations/implicationsGiven these misfits, a set of requirements is derived to improve the efficiency with which users can achieve key outcomes with current‐awareness information as these occur within a professional work environment.Originality/valueThe findings will be of interest to current‐awareness providers. The approach is relevant to information interaction researchers interested in deriving design requirements from naturalistic studies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference32 articles.

1. Attfield, S. and Blandford, A. (in press), “Understanding social and interactional practices underlying the dissemination of electronic current‐awareness in an organisational setting”, Information Processing and Management.

2. Bates, M. (2002), “Towards an integrated model of information seeking and searching”, in Wilson, T. and Barrulas, M. (Eds), The New Review of Information Behaviour Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context, Vol. 3, Taylor Graham, London, pp. 1‐15 (Proceedings ISIC IV, The 4th international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts).

3. Bayer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. (1998), Contextual Design: Defining Customer‐Centered Systems, Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.

4. Blandford, A., Connell, I. and Green, T. (2004), “Concept‐based analysis of surface and structural misfits (CASSM)”, tutorial notes, available at: www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/CASSM/downloadables/CASSMtutorial.pdf (accessed July 2009).

5. Blandford, A., Green, T., Furniss, D. and Makri, S. (2008), “Evaluating system utility and conceptual fit using CASSM”, International Journal of Human‐Computer Studies, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 393‐409.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3