The modernity of classification

Author:

Mai Jens‐Erik

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the modernity of current classification theory and work, and outline a foundation for moving classification toward a late‐modern conception.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines the conceptual foundation for current modern classification work, provides critical analysis of that approach, and outlines three conflicts with modernity that shape the path out of the consequences of modernity.FindingsThe paper presents an understanding of classification that establishes classification on a late‐modern epistemology, and it lays the contours of how to reclaim the intellectual core of classification theory and work.Originality/valueThe paper establishes a foundation for rethinking classification work, outlines consequences of current mainstream work, and provides concept for developing late‐modern classification theory and practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference59 articles.

1. Andersen, J. (2006), “Social change, modernity and bibliography: bibliography as a document and a genre in the global learning society”, Advances in Knowledge Organization, Knowledge Organization for a Global Learning Society. Proceedings of the Ninth International ISKO Conference, 4‐7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria, Vol. 10, pp. 107‐14.

2. Andersen, J. and Skouvig, L. (2006), “Knowledge organization: a sociohistorical analysis and critique”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 300‐22.

3. Beall, J. (2009), “Racially mixed people, DDC table 5 ethnic and national groups, and MARC 21 bibliographic format field 083”, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 47, pp. 657‐70.

4. Beghtol, C. (2003), “Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationship between ‘professional’ and ‘naïve’ classifications”, Knowledge Organization, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 64‐73.

5. Bijker, W.E., Bal, R. and Hendriks, R. (2009), The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by 61 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3