Coaching and teaching performance in higher education: a literature review

Author:

Burleigh Cheryl L.ORCID,Kroposki MargaretORCID,Steele Patricia B.,Smith Sherrye,Murray DaraORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this literature review was to identify best practices in coaching faculty within higher education and the subsequent benefits of effective faculty coaching programs for the retention of quality faculty. In higher education, where an emphasis is on the delivery of curriculum for student learning, faculty performance reviews are not universally defined, nor are coaching practices consistently employed. Giving teaching performance feedback promptly to faculty may be a means to foster professional growth and enhance the implementation of progressive practices to benefit student learning.Design/methodology/approachThe authors undertook a content analysis of current literature on the evaluation and coaching practices of higher education faculty that specifically addressed the quality and timeliness of feedback and gaps in practices.FindingsThrough this study, the authors gleaned recommendations for improving faculty evaluation, coaching, and feedback.Practical implicationsDeveloping coaching programs to include all higher education faculty may lead to improved teaching performance and alignment of the faculty with institutional goals. The insights from this study may provide the impetus to develop structures and processes for university-based professional development and coaching programs that could lead to positive student learning outcomes and better relationships among faculty.Originality/valueThis is the first review to use Cooper's systematic examination of current literature to explore the topics of faculty support, coaching, and development within higher education.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies

Reference27 articles.

1. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services;Health Research Policy and Systems,2008

2. Literature-searching strategies of integrative research reviewers;Knowledge,1986

3. Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews;Knowledge in Society,1988

4. Applied social research methods,1998

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Literature Review on Coaching Methods for Tutoring Students in Undergraduate Education;Education Sciences;2024-08-20

2. Bringing joy back into higher education: the potential contribution of coaching;International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education;2024-06-21

3. GURO AT GABAY: Mentoring and coaching from the lens of selected public elementary teachers;International Journal of Research Studies in Education;2024-06-01

4. Professional Development and Adjunct Perspectives;Advances in Mobile and Distance Learning;2024-01-26

5. Determinants of effective instructors in higher education institutions: a cross-cultural comparison;International Journal of Educational Management;2023-11-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3