Author:
Sanders David,Chai Tan Yong,Rogers Ian,Tewkesbury Giles E.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a multi‐expert system that can provide designers with suggestions for improvement. The multi‐expert system can analyse a design and provide designers with ideas for changes to designs at an early stage in order to improve assembly later in the manufacturing process.Design/methodology/approachThe whole system consists of four expert systems: computer‐aided design (CAD) expert, automated assembly expert, manual assembly expert and design analysis expert. The design analysis expert includes a sub‐system to collate the information from the assembly experts and to provide costs and advice.FindingsThe paper finds that the approach and the systems can reduce manufacturing costs and lead times.Research limitations/implicationsA knowledge‐based reckoning approach to design‐for‐assembly automation is used. The approach and systems can reduce manufacturing costs and lead times. The system can estimate assembly time and cost for manual or automatic assembly and select suitable assembly techniques.Practical implicationsThe system can estimate assembly time and cost for manual or automatic assembly and select a suitable assembly technique.Originality/valueThe new system models assembly, product and process design using a natural approach for capturing intelligence. The new approach categorised automated assembly and manual assembly into separate individual experts. Intelligence and knowledge from each is captured and embedded within the individual expert that represented the process. This approach enabled greater flexibility and made the sub‐systems easier to modify, upgrade, extend and reuse.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference60 articles.
1. Abdel‐Malek, L.L. (1995), “Design for automated assembly of circular parts: an algorithm”, Int. J. Prod. Econ., Vol. 41 Nos 1/3, pp. 45‐50.
2. Barnes, C.J., Jared, G.E.M. and Swift, K.G. (2003), “A pragmatic approach to interactive assembly sequence evaluation”, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 217, B4, pp. 541‐50.
3. Barnes, C.J., Jared, G.E.M. and Swift, K.G. (2004), “Decision support for sequence generation in an assembly oriented design environment”, Robotics Computer Integr. Mfg., Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 289‐300.
4. Beaudouin‐Lafon, M. (1994), Object‐Oriented Languages: Basic Principles and Programming Techniques, Chapman & Hall, London.
5. Bergasa‐Suso, J., Sanders, D.A. and Tewkesbury, G.E. (2005), “Intelligent browser‐based systems to assist internet users”, IEEE Transactions, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 580‐5.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献