Author:
Gibbons Gregory J.,Hansell Robert G.
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study is to demonstrate the benefit of design flexibility afforded by the Arcam free‐form fabrication process in the direct manufacture of injection mould inserts with complex cooling channel configurations and the process efficiency and quality gains achieved through using such inserts.Design/methodology/approachThe manufacturing process of a flood cooled injection mould insert using the Arcam EBM S12 layered manufacturing process is presented. The insert is then evaluated against two other inserts (one un‐cooled and one traditionally baffle cooled (BC)) in the manufacture of test components, with the temperature of the insert and components recorded. The process conditions were adjusted (reduced cooling time) to increase the core and component temperatures to identify the operational limits of the inserts. Thermal imaging was employed to visualize the thermal distribution within the BC and flood cooled (FC) inserts.FindingsThe cooling efficiency of the FC insert was found to be significantly higher than that of the other two inserts, and the homogeneity of the heat distribution of the FC insert was more even than the BC insert. It was possible to manufacture non‐deformed components using the FC insert with zero cooling time (ejection immediately after removal of holding pressure), this was not possible with the BC insert.Research limitations/implicationsProvides a basis for the development of more efficient and thermally homogeneous inserts through the Arcam EBM process.Practical implicationsProvides a technology/process for the manufacture of highly efficient core inserts for injection moulding, offering the industry a competitive advantage through the potential for time and cost savings and higher quality components.Originality/valueThis is the first direct comparison of an Arcam EBM manufactured insert with complex cooling geometries against traditionally cooled inserts, particularly novel is the thermal imaging analysis of the cooling efficiency and distribution.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference12 articles.
1. Ahrens, C.H. (2003), “Heat flux canals (HFC) technique: an alternative to cool down stereolithography moulds”, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 254‐8.
2. Anon, C.H. (2000), “From the inside out: LENS fuels paradigm shift in modern manufacturing”, Metal Powder Report, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 32‐5.
3. Arcam, A.B. (2005), “CAD to metal: Arcam EBM S12 system”, available at: www.arcam.com/downloads/pdf/machinedata.pdf.
4. Chua, C.K., Hong, K.H. and Ho, S.L. (1999), “Rapid tooling technology. Part 2. A case study using arc spray metal tooling”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 609‐14.
5. Connelly, R. (1998), “Rapid tooling for medical products using 3D‐keltool”, Technical Paper No. PE98‐136, Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献