Rankings, accreditation, and the international quest for quality

Author:

Blanco-Ramírez Gerardo,B. Berger Joseph

Abstract

Purpose – This paper seeks to analyze the internationalization of quality practices in higher education. In light of insufficient theorization about quality in the global dimension, the paper presents a model for value construction in higher education. Design/methodology/approach – The authors reviewed different models for quality in higher education vis-à-vis emerging international quality practices in higher education. Findings – After reviewing quality models and international quality practices, the authors argue that, in order to evaluate and improve quality in higher education, a model of value in higher education that connects quality with relevance, access, and investment is necessary. Research limitations/implications – Thus far, quality in higher education has been explored in isolation from access, relevance, and investment. The integrative approach suggested here may prove generative for researchers and help address complex educational interrogations. Practical implications – Higher education leaders are faced with decisions about quality; these leaders may benefit from connecting quality decisions with the demands on relevance, access, and investment that their local settings dictate. Originality/value – The concept of value is largely absent from conceptual discussions about quality in higher education; additionally, many discussions about quality in higher education seem to be isolated from their context. This paper addresses both these issues.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference72 articles.

1. Altbach, P.G. and Knight, J. (2007), “The internationalization of higher education: motivations and realities”, Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 290-305.

2. Altbach, P.G. , Reisberg, L. and Rumbley, L.E. (2010), Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution, Sense/UNESCO, Rotterdam.

3. Amaral, A. and Rosa, M.J. (2011), “Trans-national accountability initiatives: the case of EUA audits”, in Stensaker, B. and Harvey, L. (Eds), Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 203-220.

4. Astin, A.W. (1980), “When does a college deserve to be called high quality?”, Improving Teaching and Institutional Quality, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC, pp. 1-9.

5. Barrow, M. (1999), “Quality management systems and dramaturgical compliance”, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 27-36.

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3