From conceptual to perceptual reality: trust in digital repositories

Author:

Prieto Adolfo G.

Abstract

PurposeDigital repositories offer a great benefit to people in a variety of settings, especially since an ever‐increasing amount of information is being gathered, transmitted, and preserved through various technologies. The purpose of this paper is to underscore trust as a critical element in the infrastructure of digital repositories and to look more closely at trusted digital repositories from the perspective of the user communities for which they are designed.Design/methodology/approachThe paper looks to the literature in reviewing the concept of trust and its role in an online environment. Attention is then paid to trusted digital repositories, with close examination of the user communities’ perceptions of trust and the impact of these perceptions. Special attention is given to users within the academic community.FindingsWhile digital repositories may be trustworthy because of adherence to technological standards, accepted practices, and mechanisms for authenticating the authorship and accuracy of their content, it is ultimately their respective stakeholders – both those who deposit and use content – whose perceptions play a central role in ensuring a digital repository's trustworthiness.Research limitations/implicationsA future empirical study would be beneficial in order to measure perceptions of trust as contributing factors to the trustworthiness of digital repositories.Practical implicationsThis paper provides a useful resource for persons wishing to review the topic of trusted digital repositories or increase their awareness in this area.Originality/valueThis paper offers a focused look at various levels of trust as they relate to the dissemination of scholarly communication in the academic world, particularly through institutional repositories.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference49 articles.

1. American Council of Learned Societies (2006), “Our cultural commonwealth: the report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences”, available at: www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/OurCulturalCommonwealth.pdf (accessed 1 November 2008).

2. Atkins, D.E. et al. (2003), “Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: report of the National Science Foundation Blue‐Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure”, available at: www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).

3. Beall, J. (2005), “Metadata and data quality problems in the digital library”, Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 1‐20, available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/65/68 (accessed 1 November 2008).

4. Bedi, P. and Banati, H. (2006), “Assessing user trust to improve web usability”, Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 283‐7.

5. Berman, F. et al. (2007), “The need for formalized trust in digital repository collaborative infrastructure”, paper presented at the National Science Foundation (NSF)/Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Repositories Workshop, Phoenix, AZ, available at: www.sis.pitt.edu/∼repwkshop/papers/berman_schottlaender.pdf (accessed 31 October 2008).

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An empirical examination of data reuser trust in a digital repository;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-06-20

2. OPEN DATA CULTURE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH;International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH;2023-05-31

3. Open-Access Publishing in Tourism and Hospitality Research;Tourism;2023-05-08

4. The core of the matter: How do scientists judge trustworthiness of physical samples?;Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics;2022-10-28

5. Datenqualität und -kuratierung als Voraussetzung für Open Research Data;Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis;2021-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3