The effect of corporate social responsibility on firm risk

Author:

Nguyen Pascal,Nguyen Anna

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and risk for a sample of US firms rated by KLD. Design/methodology/approach – The authors’ approach involves three distinctive features. First, the authors use individual indicators of CSR to highlight which CSR dimension matters most for a firm’s risk. Second, the authors distinguish CSR strengths and concerns to reveal potentially nonlinear relationships. Third, the authors use a measure of risk that takes into account the predictable changes in a firm’s performance and that does not collapse the panel data into a single cross-section. This allows the CSR–risk relationship to be estimated by the variation within each firm and the variation across firms. Findings – Consistent with existing results, the authors find that CSR concerns relating to diversity, employee relations and corporate governance increase the risk to shareholders. More interestingly, the authors show that CSR strengths relating to diversity and employee relations are also associated with higher risk. The positive influence of both CSR strengths and concerns on a firm’s risk is confirmed using aggregate CSR indicators. Research limitations/implications – The results confirm that CSR strengths and concerns represent distinct constructs that should not be aggregated into a single measure. The effect of poor CSR on firm risk is more significant than what would appear to be the case using an aggregate index. Practical implications – Although lack of CSR engagement may not affect (and may even benefit) a firm’s current performance, it may seriously damage its performance in the future. Firms should be aware of this risk. Originality/value – The positive relationship found between CSR and firm risk underscores the inherent conflict between the interests of employees and those of shareholders. By committing to a more favorable treatment of their employees, firms incur a fixed cost that inevitably transfers more risk to their shareholders.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference52 articles.

1. Adams, R. , Almeida, H. and Ferreira, D. (2005), “Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance”, Review of Financial Studies , Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 1403-1432.

2. Allouche, J. and Laroche, P. (2006), “The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: a survey”, in Allouche, J. (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Performance and Stakeholders , Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 3-40.

3. Attig, N. , El Ghoul, S. , Guedhami, O. and Suh, J. (2013), “Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 117 No. 4, pp. 679-694.

4. Aupperle, K.E. , Carroll, A.B. and Hatfield, J.D. (1985), “An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 446-463.

5. Barnea, A. and Rubin, A. (2010), “Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 71-862.

Cited by 74 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3