Mental distress and human rights of asylum seekers

Author:

Campbell Emma Jean,Steel Emily Jean

Abstract

Purpose – This paper studies the experiences of asylum seekers in Australia. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between mental wellbeing, living conditions, and Australia’s detention policies in light of human rights. Design/methodology/approach – Using grounded theory, data were collected via observations, semi-structured interviews, key-informant interviews, and document analysis. Participants included seven asylum seekers and three professionals working with them. Findings – In light of a human rights framework, this paper reports on the mental distress suffered by asylum seekers in detention, the environments of constraint in which they live, and aspects of detention centre policy that contribute to these environments. The findings highlight a discrepancy between asylum seekers’ experiences under immigration detention policy and Australia’s human rights obligations. Research limitations/implications – This research indicates human rights violations for asylum seekers in detention in Australia. This research project involved a small number of participants and recommends systemic review of the policy and practices that affect asylum seekers’ mental health including larger numbers of participants. Consideration is made of alternatives to detention as well as improving detention centre conditions. The World Health Organization’s Quality Rights Tool Kit might provide the basis for a framework to review Australia’s immigration detention system with particular focus on the poor mental wellbeing of asylum seekers in detention. Originality/value – This study links international human rights law and Australian immigration detention policies and practices with daily life experiences of suffering mental distress within environments of constraint and isolation. It identifies asylum seekers as a vulnerable population with respect to human rights and mental wellbeing. Of particular value is the inclusion of asylum seekers themselves in interviews.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference73 articles.

1. A. v. Australia (1997), “CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993, Communication No. 560/1993”, available at: www.alhr.asn.au/documents/communication.html (accessed 10 March, 2014).

2. Australian Human Rights Commission (2008), “Immigration detention report: summary of observations following visits to Australia’s immigration detention facilities”, available at: www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/content/human_rights/immigration/idc2008.pdf (accessed 23 September 2011).

3. Australian Human Rights Commission (2010), “Immigration detention in Darwin: summary of observations from visits to immigration detention facilities in darwin”, available at: www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/content/human_rights/immigration/idc2010_darwin.pdf (accessed 9 June 2013).

4. Australian Human Rights Commission (2011a), “Asylum Seekers and Refugees”, available at www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/asylum-seekers-and-refugees (accessed 9 August 2011).

5. Australian Human Rights Commission (2011b), “Immigration detention at Curtin: observations from visit to curtin immigration detention centre and key concerns across the detntion network”, available at: http://hreoc.gov.au/human_rights/immigration/idc2011_curtin.html - _Toc302979142 (accessed 10 January 2014).

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3