Author:
Carson Jerome,Prescott Julie,Allen Rosie,McHugh Sandie
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to demonstrate early psychological concomitants of the Covid-19 pandemic in England on a sample of younger and older people.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire (n = 1608) was conducted on the Prolific website. Participants completed the PERMA Scale (Flourishing), the four Office of National Statistics (ONS4) Well-being Questions, the Clinical Outcomes Measure in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) and the short University of California Los Angeles Brief Loneliness Scale.FindingsData were gathered on March 18, 2020, near the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. This study looks at the effects of the developing pandemic on younger participants (18 to 25 years, n = 391) and older participants (60 to 80 years, n = 104). Flourishing levels for older participants were significantly higher (M = 107.96) than for younger participants (M = 97.80). Younger participants scored significantly higher on the ONS4 for anxiety and lower than the older participants for happiness, life satisfaction and having a worthwhile life. Levels of psychological distress (CORE-10) were also significantly lower for older participants (M = 9.06) than for younger participants (M = 14.61). Finally, younger participants scored significantly higher on the Brief UCLA Loneliness Scale (M = 6.05) than older participants (M = 4.64).Research limitations/implicationsFrom these findings, the Covid-19 pandemic was having a significantly greater effect on younger people in England, less than one week before the UK went into “lockdown”. Scores for both the Younger and Older groups on all the study measures were worse than normative comparisons. The study had no specific measure of Covid-19 anxiety, but nor was one available at the time of the survey.Practical implicationsThis study suggests that younger people (18 to 25) may be a more vulnerable group during the Covid-19 pandemic than many may have realized.Social implicationsAs a recent British Psychological Society report concluded, there is a lot of untapped wisdom amongst older groups in society.Originality/valueThis is one of the earliest studies to look at psychological distress before England went into “lockdown.”
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference34 articles.
1. Resounding meaning: a PERMA wellbeing profile of classical musicians;Frontiers in Psychology,2018
2. The pandemic of coronavirus: tackling the latest plague;Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,2020
3. Banks, J. and Xu, X. (2020), “The mental health effects of the first two months of lockdown and social distancing during the covid-19 pandemic in the UK”, IFS working Paper W20/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
4. The CORE-10: a short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies;Counselling and Psychotherapy Research,2013
5. Personal wellbeing score (PWS) – a short version of ONS4: development and validation in social prescribing;BMJ Open Quality,2019
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献